On 06/12/2009 09:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 19:01 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 06/12/2009 06:42 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote: >> >>> It's almost certainly attributable to the default install using audit. >>> Roland and various others have done a lot of work improving things, but >>> there is always going to be a per-syscall overhead to this kind of >>> thing. A few extra usec a syscall adds up after a few hundred thousand >>> calls... >> >> Is there a benefit to running audit by default? Is it worth the cost? > > ...and how does one disable it, so the people doing the benchmarks can > confirm that's the cause? service auditd stop and chkconfig auditd off if you want that to be permanent. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
