On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 19:01 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 06/12/2009 06:42 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote: > > > It's almost certainly attributable to the default install using audit. > > Roland and various others have done a lot of work improving things, but > > there is always going to be a per-syscall overhead to this kind of > > thing. A few extra usec a syscall adds up after a few hundred thousand > > calls... > > Is there a benefit to running audit by default? Is it worth the cost? ...and how does one disable it, so the people doing the benchmarks can confirm that's the cause? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
