On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 03:02:39PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Grumf ! that's annoying :( > > Thank you very much for your quick answer ! :) > > As I only need the CAP_SYS_BOOT, I will define it manually in the source > code and will remove the include, that's ugly but anyway... :/ > > As I understood, the fix in the kernel conflicts with the workaround in > userspace, right ? > I was wondering if I should notify this to the maintainer of the libcap > or is it already known ? > Someone else suggested including <sys/types.h> first, which should work around it. That's what GNU coreutils did... (a change in the include ordering broke it.) Which release are you seeing this on... F-11? cheers, Kyle -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
