Re: Fedora LaTeX SIG?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le jeudi 11 juin 2009 à 20:38 +0300, Jussi Lehtola a écrit :

> On Fedora 11
> $ yum search fonts|wc -l
> 467

Actually
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatprovides "font(*)" | sed "s
+-[0-9]*:.*++g"|wc -l
233

And every single package listed here was re-done for F11 because we only
introduced the means to autodetect font provides during this cycle (and
a lot of them were re-reviewed because of srpm naming changes)

> This is less than 1/4 of the amount of packages Tex Live will bring.

So what? This is not the upper limit of what can be reviewed. This upper
limit is not known because we didn't manage to saturate the font review
queue yet. What is missing is font packagers, not reviewers.

It is very easy for a single person to review many packages as long as
they follow strictly a simple well-known pre-approved template. You
basically just run diff or meld and check the licensing is acceptable.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux