>>>>> "JL" == Jussi Lehtola <jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: JL> Hi everyone, there seems to be quite a lot of room for improvement JL> in the current Fedora LaTeX scheme. I will point out that there has been some discussion in this area and plans formed, but for some bizarre reason the discussion happened on the rel-eng list and not anywhere where most people would notice. Look for the thread "TeX Live 2008/9 packaging and you" at http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/rel-eng/2009-June/thread.html What I took away from reading (but not being able to participate in) that discussion is that our texlive* packages are going to be split up and that the package review team is going to have an astonishing amount of work to do. JL> There are a lot of useful LaTeX packages that would be nice to JL> have on Fedora, however we don't have any LaTeX package guidelines JL> for now. Writing those is part of the proposed process. JL> Also something should be done about the TeX Live packages. Doing something about that is part of the proposed process. JL> IMHO the TeX compiler package should be a bare minimum with JL> everything else shipped in their own packages, this would make JL> updating easier. And that's what's proposed. JL> Would anyone be interested in creating/joining a LaTeX SIG? I don't personally care much about TeX but I have to provide a proper TeX installation to my users, so I'll be happy to help where I can. - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
