Le mardi 09 juin 2009 à 10:20 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 16:06 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > My anger is because people don't honor our packaging guidelines not even > > if they are asked to do so. The guidelines are very clear in this case: > > "Multiple packages have files in a common directory but none of them > > requires others. [...] In this case, each package must own > > the /usr/share/Foo/Animal/ directory." > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership > > Well, part of the problem is that the review guidelines strike a very > different tone: Just create a gnome-filesystem package that owns your common directories and be done with it. rpm requires something to own dirs but you're the packagers decide what this something is -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
