Le mer 14/07/2004 Ã 21:23, David Malcolm a Ãcrit : > On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 12:52 +0200, Matias Feliciano wrote: > > My last "problems" : > > http://feliciano.matias.free.fr/Capture-Evolution-1.png > > http://feliciano.matias.free.fr/Capture-Mozilla-1.png > > http://feliciano.matias.free.fr/Capture-Evolution-2.png > > http://feliciano.matias.free.fr/Capture-Mozilla-2.png > > Which version of gtkhtml3 and evolution were these with? FC2 : gtkhtml3-3.0.10-1 evolution-1.4.6-2 > Have you filed these two in Bugzilla? No. The point is that I saw too many "bad rendering" with Evolution (since 1.0). Now i only use Evolution at home to read Evolution-friendly mails (Linux stuff like fedora list :-)). If I need a good html viewer I use Mozilla and I don't try to fix Evolution. I know, I am wrong. I will not be surprised if many users do like me (mozilla => html (windows environment), evolution => txt (Linux environment)).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=
