Le mer 14/07/2004 Ã 02:03, Per Bjornsson a Ãcrit : > On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 15:26, Matias Feliciano wrote: > > > There is big difference between Evolution and Mozilla. > > Mozilla "just works" with html mail. > > I don't write html mail but I receive html mail :-( > > Evolution is a great software, but at my office I need Mozilla. > > Just how does Evolution not "just work" with HTML mail? My last "problems" : http://feliciano.matias.free.fr/Capture-Evolution-1.png http://feliciano.matias.free.fr/Capture-Mozilla-1.png http://feliciano.matias.free.fr/Capture-Evolution-2.png http://feliciano.matias.free.fr/Capture-Mozilla-2.png > Sure, remote > image loading is turned off by default but that is a feature. You can > easily either turn it on globally if you want or load images in a > particular message with View->Message Display->Load Images (in Mozilla > Mail I have only figured out how to do that configuration globally, and > I actually do want to load the images in some mail after seeing the > source. I haven't looked hard in Moz though, Evo does the job for me.) > > Is there anything else in HTML mail that doesn't work in Evolution? I don't know if my problems are related to CSS, crappy html, outlook touch, ... but Evolution isn't "that just works" compliant. > > /Per > > -- > Per Bjornsson <perbj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=
