Le mer 14/07/2004 Ã 02:52, Havoc Pennington a Ãcrit : > On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 16:15, Matias Feliciano wrote: > > And for FC4 : > > Default email : Thunderbird > > Default Calendar : Mozilla calendar (sunbird) > > Alternative email/Calendar : Evolution > > Default browser : Firefox > > Alternative browser : epiphany > > I'd swap your defaults and alternatives, but agree on this set of apps. > > > For the desktop "market" it's important to be able to use the same "core > > desktop" applications with Linux and Windows (OOo, Thunderbird, > > Firefox). > > I agree with this, but to me the defaults should be the Linux native and > optimized user experience, and the alternatives should be the "Windows > migration" applications. Red Hat/Fedora use Mozilla by default. Why Red Hat choose Mozilla over Galeon and Epiphany ? For migration propose ? btw, Galeon and Epiphany use Gecko which is not Linux native. cross-platform does not mean "push windows touch anywhere". Mozilla is a "Windows migration" application only if the Windows user already use Mozilla. Mozilla is a "Linux migration" application only if the Linux user already use Mozilla. If I show Firefox to a Windows user they don't say : - great Windows application, sound like IE. If I show Evolution to a Windows user ... > > This is assuming of course basically comparable functionality; OO.org is > the default since it is the only app with really suitable functionality. > > Havoc > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=
