On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 18:31:27 -0300, Paulo wrote: > > Hi. > > > > As I don't have the time to maintain audacious any more I'm orphaning the > > following packages: > > > > audacious > > audacious-plugins > > libmowgli > > mcs > > > > The last two are dependencies which, as far as I am aware, are used by > > nothing else. > > > > There is an accompanying package in the Voldemort Repository which contains > > the less free and more useful media codecs. That would be up for grabs, > > too, preferrably by the same person. > > > > There are several bugs open against the package, most of which will > > probably be fixed by the current upstream release. > > I have some limited interest in Audacious only, because it's one of the music players I use from time to time. I would be willing to examine the current state of the Fedora packages, the currently open bugs, and take a look at the new stable 2.0 series, too. The 1.5 series has been declared legacy. However, I don't want to take over the packages in the external repository. As such, anybody else who wants all of the packages would take precedence. > The new binaries are called audiocious2 and audtool2, and they seem to be > working just fine. > > In theory, it would be possible to keep the old audacious and the new one. > Another possibility is just to rename some files to match the previous > version. That would deviate from upstream and break any scripts users may use to control a running instance of Audacious2. If the two releases can coexist, I would say we don't make them conflict with eachother. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
