Re: Announcing Fedora Activity Day - Fedora Development Cycle 2009

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 13:49 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> > And the optimization there is fairly well known. We need to read in and 
> > not change the prestodelta file. It's on my short-ish createrepo list.
> 
> Hrm, bill thought it was something on the mash side, where he validates
> the signature of all the existing deltas to catch if a gpg sig changed
> without a n-v-r bump.

I haven't characterized that that is *definitely* what's causing pain,
but it's a likely source.

It's also a hard one to optimize unless you decree that packages will
never change signatures, which doesn't seem practical.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux