> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484862 > > > > > > --- Comment #2 from John (J5) Palmieri <johnp@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-03 11:45:26 EDT --- > Of course it conflicts with GConf2. It is GConf2 with a patch. Pretty much > binary ABI compatible unless the two have diverged recently. It shouldn't be > used beyond OLPC and even there with the fact that they are getting more memory > and disk space they should just start using the Orbit2 dependency. It was a > hack to reduce dependencies while still letting GNOME packages run without > modification. > > DConf is the next generation DBus GConf and should be parallel installable once > it is released (and accepted by GNOME). Why are the relevant Obsoletes missing (commented out)? These packages are available to package management tools. The Fedora guidelines disallow implicit conflicts. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list