On 01.06.2009 21:50, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:49 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> - should we set an way earlier freezes date for things like anaconda, >> kernel, isolinux, grub and other crucial pieces to make sure they are >> in >> better shape a bit earlier and thus are less likely a reason for >> release >> slips? > If you're basing this off the F11 cycle, it's worth noting that kernel > and anaconda have not been 'reasons for release slips' in this cycle in > that late changes were made to them which turned out to be bad ideas. I know, but: > It > was simply that there were bugs in them all along which were critical > enough to block the release. An earlier freeze date would not have > helped at all. It might have helped to find the problem earlier -- I for example got the impression that a lot of people had problems with the storage rewrite and thus aborted their tests with Alpha or Beta. CU knurd -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
