On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:49 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > - should we set an way earlier freezes date for things like anaconda, > kernel, isolinux, grub and other crucial pieces to make sure they are > in > better shape a bit earlier and thus are less likely a reason for > release > slips? If you're basing this off the F11 cycle, it's worth noting that kernel and anaconda have not been 'reasons for release slips' in this cycle in that late changes were made to them which turned out to be bad ideas. It was simply that there were bugs in them all along which were critical enough to block the release. An earlier freeze date would not have helped at all. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
