>> am I the only one who knows that "if p then q" will evaluate to T when p=F > As you neither did define the relation of T or F to either p or q your "proof" is just a logical fallacy. I fear the same is true for your inappropriateness-rating. It's full of fail. the statement was like this "if it was rated, if the upstream, if the maintainer feels ... -> add a comment" if non of those happened, ie. it was not rated nor the upstream carries such note nor the maintainer feels that it should then the whole statement is true ie. it should not stop the package from being accepted. > The wiki on fedoraproject.org is most likely not the right place for such a list. then ok, it seems this is true and I realize that too late sorry for wasting your time. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
