does the upstream web site for evolution carries a note that it's not suitable for certain group of users ? does the maintainers or reviewers see that it should ? am I the only one who knows that "if p then q" will evaluate to T when p=F yes, I hope that no one in fedora project pack nudity images in official repos of fedora, but I have no power to stop them from doing so, that's way I suggested when someone want's to do let he warn us in a wiki page if he or his upstream carries such a note. some one asked me to pay the rating fees for every package! other started to give me examples about different people having different opinions I consider all this is off-topic. yes, English is not my first language, and law is not one of my interests, and for sure there exists a better phrasing of the page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/InappropriateContents but nobody have shown me a serious problem in that page > Don't tie words together, separate them with spaces (MediaWiki will transform them in underscores). ok that's an easy task Inappropriate_Packages_Advisory > Also, those packages are not inappropriate. They _might be_. let's say Suggested_Inappropriate_Packages_Advisory but I guess that Advisory and Suggested carries same meaning I think we should go with one of the two words (either Suggested or Advisory) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
