On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 03:09, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 02:23, Toshio wrote:
> > Hello packagers,
>
> > I'm currently inclining towards option 1 out of laziness and since it's
> > what packages within Core seem to do but I thought I'd introduce it here
> > to gauge reactions and elicit other suggestions first.
>
> I can recommend splitting at least the library package off; that way
> 32/64 compatibility becomes easier ;)
>
Does that mean the packages in Core that don't split out the libraries
should be fixed up? Or are there some exceptions? If it's "patches
welcome" I'll look into creating a few bugzillas later this month.
-Toshio
--
_______S________U________B________L________I________M________E_______
t o s h i o + t i k i - l o u n g e . c o m
GA->ME 1999
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
