On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 02:23, Toshio wrote: > Hello packagers, > I'm currently inclining towards option 1 out of laziness and since it's > what packages within Core seem to do but I thought I'd introduce it here > to gauge reactions and elicit other suggestions first. I can recommend splitting at least the library package off; that way 32/64 compatibility becomes easier ;) (it's possible otherwise too, just with libs split off it's suddenly entirely trivial)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
