Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2009, 13:03 -0700 schrieb Jesse Keating: > On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 12:44 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > This has the advantage that it places no extra burden on regular > > maintainers, and if the China changes break, it doesn't affect the main > > Fedora repositories. > > Seems like an awful lot of effort and bullcrap for the 5 or 6 packages > involved. So does the policy. You just managed to nullify the policy and the whole discussion in a single sentence. If it's just 5 or 6 packages anyway, who needs a policy? Regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
