Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2009, 09:03 -0700 schrieb Jesse Keating: > On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 14:20 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > Not really. Spot just explained the rationale for writing the policy, > > but as I already outlined that the policy does not cover all the cases > > it was designed for. Maybe I should have asked more precisely: What is > > the use of a policy that does not really solve the problems? > > The policy of "No flags" solved the problem enough for RHT and RHL so > that it was distributable and RHEL was sellable into China. Anything > less than that policy is going to be up for debate as to if it "solves > the problem". If China was the problem, why not name names here? (or even better in the policy itself) In my mail I gave an example that is not addressed by the proposal. Regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
