On 05/13/2009 02:32 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/13/2009 11:37 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
You do realize that Fedora's trademark policy is even "worse" ?
But we don't expect all third parties to go through the trademark approval
process (and they don't or even can't, for different reasons), we have them
ship generic logos, the new Fedora Remix artwork (which also has a policy
to follow, but a less strict one when it comes to modification of the
software than Firefox!) or their own logos instead. I don't see why we
shouldn't do the same for Firefox.
Firefox already allows easy rebranding. If you want to fork, you can
take advantage of that but what exactly do you want to patch that
Mozilla is not allowing you to do?
Better yet, what bug have you filed against the Fedora package that I
have refused to patch locally without good reason? Sending things to be
fixed upstream and waiting for upstream to take the fix is not uncommon
for any package in the distro.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
