On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 19:37 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > There *are* packages explicitly requiring notification-daemon, so this > needs to be rephrased: Why is xfce4-notifyd choosen *although* (!= > "unless") some packages are hardcoding notification-daemon, which > already satisfies all requirements? Likely because when yum is doing it's depsolving, it first hit a generic requires, before it hit anything that specifically required notification-daemon. So the shorter name got in, then later it found the specific requires and had to bring in notification-daemon. Then conflict. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
