On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 14:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 13:15 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > I think the problem is, that some packages notification-deamon instead > > of (virtual) desktop-notification-deamon: [...] > Except that I don't see why those would cause problems during the build, > when they're not even getting installed in the buildroots. > > The problem was/is that libnotify-devel requires a > desktop-notification-daemon (via libnotify itself), and yum will install > both packages that provide it. How did you come to this conclusion? I'm not saying it's impossible, but the above seems unlikely unless yum picks one on the virtual provides hit and then it gets an explicit requires on the other (which isn't the same thing). -- James Antill <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
