On 05/13/2009 09:37 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 05/13/2009 06:53 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > >> I'm sure the team would be happy to have more people providing >> constructive input, but saying there's only one involved is incorrect. > > I am well aware of more than one person working on the project and for a > long time. I am not claiming that Spot is the only package maintainer in > the group but to expand on what I said, diversity is the key. For others > to consider giving input, a demo instance needs to be running and > visible to others. If it close to completion, then now would be a good > time. Demo instance is running and visible to others. We have not been aggressively advertising it because: A) It is a test instance, and the performance is non on-par with what it will be when we go live. We didn't want to spend time wading through the "OMG THIS IS SLOWER THAN BUGZLILLA!!!1!" B) We have been constantly cycling it as we've been fixing blocker bugs. The last thing we wanted was for anyone to think they could depend on it. C) Anyone who asked to see it has been pointed to it (several folks have asked). So, without further ado and the above caveats, look at our pre-beta test instance: https://publictest16.fedoraproject.org/community/ We know lots of stuff is broken, we have a pile of blocker bugs open in our trac instance. Please don't rely on this test instance for anything. ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
