On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:33:40AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >On 05/13/2009 12:16 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > >> We have a mailing list: https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/moksha >> We have a website: https://fedorahosted.org/fedoracommunity/ >> We have wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCommunity >> We have regular weekly meetings (telephone) that are open to all >> interested parties (Mondays at 10 AM Eastern, 1400 UTC, Fedora Talk, ext >> 2001) >> We have an open code repository: >> https://fedorahosted.org/fedoracommunity/browser >> >> In fact, I think the only thing we're missing is a Silo. ;) > >Good to know all this but there is definitely a big lack of >communication on this development with the rest of the Fedora community. >There was a very brief mail to fedora-announce list but how much input >are you getting input from Fedora maintainers whose job this is supposed >to make easier? Yes, they are. I've been asked several questions myself. Spot maintains an ungodly number of packages. I think they're getting plenty of input. Please, enough with the lack of communication. Not every project needs a big massive PR campaign or huge call for participation. Particularly in the extremely early design phases where most of the degenerates into bike shedding and pony wanting. I'd rather see a somewhat usable tool be announced than have to read another 300 emails about what someone's idea of Fedora should be. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list