Le Lun 11 mai 2009 16:34, Martin Stransky a écrit : > > On 05/11/2009 04:27 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On 05/11/2009 10:15 AM, David wrote: >> Ok, just so I make sure I understand your argument completely. "It's >> fine to include a pre-release copy of Thunderbird and Firefox >> because >> you can bludgeon unsupported extensions into being supported by >> following an undocumented and potentially dangerous hack." >> >> Seriously, people. This is exactly the sort of elitist bullshit that >> puts people off of using Fedora. Furthermore, it's damned >> hypocritical. > > There's Fedora 10 with Firefox 3.0 and Thunderbird 2.0 in already. > Nobody forces you to update to F11 now, when it contains those > "unstable" packages. Really, that just mean we need to find some packagers for the most popular ff/thb extensions. Having an external unmanaged software source is the actual problem here. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
