Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Patrice Dumas wrote:
You've got it - And named a few I have in mind, which I consider to be not to be not in a shape to base a distro on.
BTW: This duplicated "not to be not to be" likely is a c'n'p related-issue in FC10's thunderbird ;)
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list