Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 02:00:45PM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 07:30:27PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Everything? Maybe it escapes you, but it's always the same issue:
When "upstream" == "@RH", common sense and rationality seems to be
switched off in Fedora.
Red Hat's not upstream to Fedora.
That's not what Ralf is saying.
Exactly.
> RH is upstream for some packages or
involved especially in upstream (for example, NetworkManager, hal,
consolekit, gdm, many gnome components...), and in that case it is
not rare that the corresponding packages end up in fedora releases
although there are features that were present in previous components
that are not already ready, or the applications are not that well
tested as shown in rawhide testing.
You've got it - And named a few I have in mind, which I consider to be
not to be not in a shape to base a distro on.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
