Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 10 May 2009 11:03:19 -0700, Toshio wrote: > >>>> Most likely: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/pkg-orphans.txt >>> Does that mean I can stop with following the non-responsive maintainer >>> policy for ghenry and "cpan2rpm" (as it's on the list)? >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/498746 >>> >> Yes. I'll be mass orphaning this tonight. Do you think this package >> should be retired instead of simply orphaned? > > Retiring it would be better. Bz 498746 sums up that everybody seems to > use'n'prefer cpanspec instead. There's somebody who would sign up as the > new owner (as a last resort), but he would also prefer to retire cpan2rpm. > Retired. Thanks for the heads up! -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
