On Sun, 10 May 2009 11:03:19 -0700, Toshio wrote: > >> Most likely: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/pkg-orphans.txt > > > > Does that mean I can stop with following the non-responsive maintainer > > policy for ghenry and "cpan2rpm" (as it's on the list)? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/498746 > > > Yes. I'll be mass orphaning this tonight. Do you think this package > should be retired instead of simply orphaned? Retiring it would be better. Bz 498746 sums up that everybody seems to use'n'prefer cpanspec instead. There's somebody who would sign up as the new owner (as a last resort), but he would also prefer to retire cpan2rpm. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
