On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 13:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Java is still a huge mess; there are any number of webapps that just >>> plain don't work in 64-bit. (I'm not sure this is Java's fault per se, >>> but the fact remains that things don't work and the authors seem content >>> to tell you to install a 32-bit browser instead of fixing their broken >>> code...) > >> Hmm, that's nasty. I hadn't personally run across any of those yet, >> which is I guess why I didn't know about it. Thanks for the info. > > I've run into it twice in the past two months for apps used inside Red > Hat. (Not developed inside Red Hat, I'm glad to say.) This is out of a > sample of exactly two apps, since I avoid webapps where I can. So I > admit I don't have a lot of data, but from here it looks like a problem. Well if our java implementation is broken it should be broken for 32 bit too. As for sun's java they have released a 64 bit plugin. So this should be no longer relevant. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
