Re: 182 pending F11 stable updates. WTF?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 03:32 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

> > This has
> > nothing to do with the release prep process, but how we version update
> > packages (we version them in such a way that an update shipped for
> > Fedora N-1 can often become versioned higher than the version of that
> > package in Fedora N release repos, and that's not a problem you can ever
> > 'fix' in the ISO generation process).
> 
> The trick would be to decouple "DVD-preparations" from "F11-release".
> 
> One way to achieve this would be rel-eng to start with a copy/snapshot 
> of rawhide, but to let F11-release "roll on", e.g. by spawning 
> "F11-updates".
> 
> When encountering issues with their set of packages, they would have to 
> try fixing their issues by adding packages from "updates" to their set 
> of packages.

That doesn't help at all, because in the end, they're still building a
static image. As soon as someone ships an F10 update *after* the F11
images are released, things start breaking. It's just in the nature of
a) static release images and b) how we version updates.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux