On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 10:59 +0200, Michal Hlavinka wrote: > > I really agree with this. I think we need F11/updates and F11/updates-testing > soon after devel freeze. You get bugs reported for snapshots, previews,... but > fixing these bugs and especially delivering them to users is too much difficult > imho. Erm, it's too hard to do the build, then propose a freeze break to fix the bug? If the bug is important enough that you're getting reports on it, why not propose that the final release has the bug fixed? > > In my dreamworld we have rawhide -> F11, F11/updates, F11/updates-testing in a > few days after devel freeze. I think at least F11/updates-testing (without > F11/updates available before day or two ago F11 GA) would be really > appreciated by developers. I'm not sure what you mean by rawhide -> F11, however you do bring up an interesting idea. Shortly after the freeze, if we did start releasing updates-testing, then the things that pass -testing could indeed go to the release rather than updates. That's not a terrible idea, I'll have to think some on it and talk with the bodhi developer. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
