On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 21:04 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > If we don't maintain two general releases in parallel, we are cutting > short to a six month release *and* update cycle instead of a release > cycle of six months and update cycle of 13 months, approx. Do you have > an alternative? Not really, I just said it would be easier. No matter how long our development or support cycle is, I don't think we'd ever be able to "shut down" N-1 as soon as N is released. Too many people will want more time to move from N-1 to N so we'll always have multiple streams going. Things would be easier if we could enforce that no N-1(+updates) package is NVR higher than the packages in N, but that involves doing some unsavory things to package n-v-rs or epochs. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
