On 05/08/2009 08:44 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > > Yeah, I haven't put a lot of effort into such a thing myself. It'd be > far easier if we didn't have multiple active releases at any time, or > didn't allow version bumps in N-* releases. Of course, those are even > more "flamey" topics. If we don't maintain two general releases in parallel, we are cutting short to a six month release *and* update cycle instead of a release cycle of six months and update cycle of 13 months, approx. Do you have an alternative? Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
