On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 14:56 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > time began and still is. I cannot tape over that fact in PA. ... > Nah. using this is a misuse. You always should access SPDIF via the > 'iec985' device, which is what PA does. It will switch the appropriate ... > This is wrong. PA handles spdif correctly. There is not > regression. And PA handles the surround mixer situation better than > the raw ALSA mixer. There is no regression. Lennart - I'm not talking about PA. I've already said the way PA does analog surround and S/PDIF, with its profile support, is a great improvement. I like it. But the current counter-proposal for F11 is to ship gnome-volume-control and no other mixer by default. g-v-c does not expose PA's profile support. So no matter how great PA is - by this proposal, we would *not be exposing* all that greatness by default in F11 at all. People would somehow have to figure out to install pavucontrol before they could get to that greatness. The question is g-v-c vs. legacy mixer, not PulseAudio per se. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
