On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 08:01:33PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: >On 04/30/2009 07:48 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: >I also think it should be considered a good working rule not to replace >application with a another application until that application provides >equal or better >functionality than the previous one. That is the crux of the whole argument though. Side A says PVAC doesn't provide equal or better functionality, Side B says that "functionality" is weird-case and out of scope. So it depends on who is doing the determination of 'equal or better'. Which, apparently, can produce different results. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
