Re: F10: something broken with lvm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:55:56PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
This is till causing major headaches.
Once a system has had its device names changed to /dev/dm-N style then how are we supposed to know when there is a conflict with device mounting. /proc/mounts will show our LVM mounting by it's normal LVM names such as /dev/mapper/VolGroup01-LogVol00 but 'blkid' will have no listing for this device under that name any longer. It will have /dev/dm-N entries. But how are we to correlate these devices? If our scripts attempt to mount /dev/dm-1 because it has no mount showing under /proc/mounts the script gets an error because the same device is mounted as /dev/mapper/VolGroup01-LogVol00. How are we to tell that these devices have the same UUID when 'blkid' only lists one of them?

Compare the device major/minor numbers.

Yeah, we can do that. That's really low level. I'll just be glad when these /dev/dm-N devices are removed from user space. They have broken a lot of stuff.

Regards,
Gerry

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux