On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 09:14:35AM +0100, Huw Lynes wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:43:21 -0400 > seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > So, would it be completely inappropriate to nominate ethereal for > > removal from fc3 due to its spotty history of security problems? > > > It may have a spotty security history but it's phenomenally useful. I would be > unhappy to see it go unless there was a package of equivalent functionality to > replace it. I believe the point was it should be in Fedora Extras not Core. So it would still be available for install. Paul
