On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:43:21 -0400 seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So, would it be completely inappropriate to nominate ethereal for > removal from fc3 due to its spotty history of security problems? > It may have a spotty security history but it's phenomenally useful. I would be unhappy to see it go unless there was a package of equivalent functionality to replace it. Is there something we should be using instead? -- | Huw Lynes | The Moving Picture Company | | System Administrator | 127 Wardour Street | |.........................| London, W1F 0NL |
