Re: Abandon "Default Desktop"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 15:53 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> We could make odd releases with Gnome default and even releases KDE
> default. That way, we can get a better distributed feedback. Right
> now, I believe that there are more Gnome users out there just because
> it is the default. New users don't mess with the defaults.
> 
> Just an idea.
> Orcan
> 
That springs out a question out of curiosity - how many people are
actually using the DVD releases compared to our Live Spins? I mean, I
don't see much pros in the DVD based spin (which isn't even live, so you
cannot check if it will work before installation) and the other spins
are pretty much 'decentralised' desktop-wise sans the fact that for most
of Fedora, Desktop \approx GNOME (which means we have Desktop SIG that
takes care of GNOME stuff and KDE SIG taking care of KDE, similarly
Desktop Live spin being probably equal to what GNOME Live would be and
KDE spin and XFCE spin and LXDE spin and ...).
Martin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux