Re: development packages and multilib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 17:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > We rely on being able to build 32- and 64-bit binaries as part of the 
> > same build. How exactly is that supposed to work with mock?
> 
> I wonder how you get it to work now ... you must have a very short
> list of packages you depend on.

I've compiled the Second Life client this way. It has a hell of a
dependency list, and it works just fine.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux