Re: development packages and multilib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 13:29 -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote:
It works just fine. No way in hell is mock going to be acceptable for a
quick turn-around edit-compile-test cycle on a massive OpenGL app.

Supporting multilib creates untold number of disasters and unfixable
situations.  Its just not worth it when you can maintain a chroot (mock
or not) of the arch you wish to fiddle with.

...which means -m32 would stop working, which means my $DAYJOB would have to change distros on our build machines.

We rely on being able to build 32- and 64-bit binaries as part of the same build. How exactly is that supposed to work with mock?

--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
Use the --force, Luke -- Riccardo Iaconelli

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux