Re: Use bash patchlevel as part of RPM version?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:15:35PM -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 08:22 +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > There is no difference to the kernel's diffs for version 2.6.29 to
> > 2.6.29.1 like `patch-2.6.29.1.bz2'.
> 
> .. Except for the fact the kernel patch has "2.6.29.1" right in its
> name. The kernel doing it like bash would look like:
> 
> kernel-2.6.29.tar.bz2
> patch-001.bz2

Not sure what you mean, the bash diffs are named like "bash40-017". It
does contain the major/minor/patchlevel versions (it lacks
conventional delimiters and a sane suffix like ".diff" or ".patch",
but that's due to the project's legacy).
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpRRN7o3SNGp.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux