On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 09:02 +0200, Roman Rakus wrote: > Hi, > There is a bug (#496780) requesting to use patchlevel of bash as part of > RPM version. So today bash-4.0-6.fc11.i586 would be > bash-4.0.16-6.fc11.i586. What do you think about it? Could it break > anything? > RR General rule of thumb is follow what's in the tarball filename if possible. And the patchlevel isn't in it. But putting the patchlevel in somewhere isn't a bad idea. I'd go with something like this: bash-4.0-1.pl16 bash-4.0-2.pl17 bash-4.0-3.pl18 ... That is, follow the guidelines for a non-numeric post release: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Version (Even though it's technically numeric...)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
