On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 09:02:09AM +0200, Roman Rakus wrote: > Hi, > There is a bug (#496780) requesting to use patchlevel of bash as part of > RPM version. So today bash-4.0-6.fc11.i586 would be > bash-4.0.16-6.fc11.i586. What do you think about it? Could it break > anything? > RR > Since bash doesn't have any fancy provides try something like for package in `repoquery --whatrequires bash`; do echo $package; repoquery -R $package|grep bash; done to check what dependencies are pointing to bash's version. I think it looks quite safe, but OTOH we're in a freeze with bash being an important package, so it's better to change it for >= F12 or at the very least as an update to 4.0.17 later in F11's maintenance timeline. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp9GRkikrMjj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
