On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:56:34AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> Matthew Garrett wrote: >> >On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 07:02:20PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> >>Abusing the Fedora as Guinea pigs, as they've done many times before. >> > >> >By doing the change upstream? >> > >> >> When "upstreams" are identical to the fedora maintainers, the "upstream >> argument" is moot. They are in a position to commit any stupidity they >> want upstream and label it "upstream decsion". > > I think that basically all the Fedora X maintainers are upstream - > however, not all of upstream are Fedora X maintainers. Just one question. How can fedora ever be objective about an issue like this if: (quote) "all the Fedora X maintainers are upstream" .... ? i'm interested in your reply on this one. (and a reply from all RH/fedora ppl in this thread btw) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
