Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 07:02:20PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Christopher Stone wrote:
2009/4/16 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 01:37 +0500, Suren Karapetyan wrote:
You will not find anyone @RH who will agree that
previews behavior was better
On the contrary, you'll likely find many people who work for Red Hat
that would prefer the old behavior, they're just not wasting their time
by arguing about it on a distribution mailing list.
So what are they doing instead?
Abusing the Fedora as Guinea pigs, as they've done many times before.
By doing the change upstream?
When "upstreams" are identical to the fedora maintainers, the "upstream
argument" is moot. They are in a position to commit any stupidity they
want upstream and label it "upstream decsion".
If then, management and QA/control is dominated by "one governing state
party" (Like in Fedora), all control and QA is effectively non-existent.
In other words, it's simply a matter of powers.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
