Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2009, 11:56 +0200 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:37:57 +0200, Christoph wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, den 08.04.2009, 06:37 -0700 schrieb Toshio Kuratomi: > > > Fernando Nasser wrote: > > > > That is correct. All the packages that install things in this > > > directory must own it so it will only go away when the last of them is > > > uninstalled. > > > > > > > > If you find a package that own a file in that directory and does not > > > own it, then you should indeed file a bug for a missing ownership. > > > > > > > > > > ... or the package has a dependency on one of those packages (usually > > > hicolor-icon-theme). Either is acceptable practice. > > > > Since all of the mentioned programs are gtk based and gtk2 requires > > hicolor-icon-theme we have a valid dependency chain here. > > And that means, the quoted packages should _not_ own those directories > themselves, because the dirs belong into hicolor-icon-theme which > is included in the dep-chain. Exactly, I thought that was obvious. (Sarcasm: How comes I'm not surprised how 'well' somebody with a redhat.com address knows our packaging giudelines once again?) Regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
