On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 01:47 -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote: > On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 18:37 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > > If it's written in python (which yum is), then it should be relatively > > > easy to port to Windows compared to C/C++ code. > > > > yum is, but rpm (which includes rpm-python) is not; that will take > > significantly more effort to put in (e.g., Add/Remove integration). > > I don't think Window's Add/Remove is equipped to handle a bazillion > RPMS. Though putting a single "Add/Remove RPMs" entry that starts up > gpk-application or something isn't a bad idea. All of which is moot > until RPM actually works on Win32... I don't think there would be a bazillion RPMs; most of the infrastructure is already provided, so it would be things like widget toolkits, specialized libs (e.g. liboil), and of course apps. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
